Cost-Benefit Analysis: When Replacing Microsoft 365 with LibreOffice Actually Saves Money

Hook: License bills climbing, cloud surprises, and a looming audit — can LibreOffice actually lower your TCO?

Short answer: Sometimes — but only when you model total cost of ownership (TCO) end-to-end. This article gives finance and IT teams a repeatable, auditable cost model that compares Microsoft 365 and LibreOffice across licensing, migration, support, productivity impact, security/compliance, and break-even timelines (with numeric scenarios and a ready-to-run Python snippet).

Executive summary — most important conclusions up front

• LibreOffice can save money when an organization has low reliance on Microsoft-only features (Teams telephony, SharePoint-driven apps, VBA macros tied to Office365 APIs, Power Platform flows), a high percentage of offline or document-centric users, and the ability to absorb migration and support costs.
• It rarely saves money for organizations heavily invested in Microsoft collaboration, identity, conditional access, or Power Platform; the hidden switching costs and productivity drag typically exceed license savings.
• Break-even analysis is essential: a one-page per-user comparison is insufficient. Include migration project costs, training, support headcount, macro remediation, vendor support, cloud storage, and realistic productivity delta assumptions.
• 2026 trend note: AI add-ons and premium SaaS bundles introduced in late 2024–2025 increased per-user Microsoft 365 costs for many enterprises; that widens the scenarios where LibreOffice can be cost-effective, but also raises the stakes for capability loss.

Why CIOs and CFOs are re-evaluating productivity suites in 2026

In late 2024 through 2025 the market saw two converging forces: cloud SaaS prices rose (AI add-ons and premium security bundles) and enterprise budgets tightened under macro pressure. By 2026, procurement and engineering leaders are doing deeper TCO modeling, not just license line-item comparisons. They want to know: what is the true cost of functionality loss, what support must we add, and how long until savings justify migration?

Key 2025–2026 developments that matter

• Microsoft continues offering AI and security as add-ons (per-user/seat charges) — this inflates list prices for many organizations compared to 2019–2021 baselines.
• Regulatory focus on data privacy and sovereignty pushes some organizations toward offline or self-hosted solutions, improving the business case for open-source desktop suites.
• Third-party vendors now provide enterprise-grade LibreOffice support, migration services, and macro remediation tools that reduce migration risk and shorten break-even timelines.

How to model TCO — the rigorous, repeatable framework

Use a model that totals three multi-year buckets: (1) Upfront & migration costs, (2) Ongoing annual costs, and (3) Productivity and business impact. Below are variables, formulae, and a worked example.

Define the variables

• N — number of users in scope
• L_m — annual Microsoft 365 cost per user (licensing + core storage)
• L_l — annual LibreOffice per-user cost (usually 0, but include managed support or subscriptions)
• M — one-time migration project cost (tools, conversions, macro remediation)
• T — one-time training cost (materials, time per user * fully loaded salary)
• S_m — annual support & ops for Microsoft 365 (internal FTE or vendor fees)
• S_l — annual support & ops for LibreOffice (internal FTE ramp, vendor support)
• P_m(t) and P_l(t) — productivity impact in year t expressed as monetary value (positive for gains, negative for losses)
• Y — analysis horizon in years (commonly 3–5 years)

Base formulas

Compute total 3-year TCO as an example (replace with your chosen Y):

# Microsoft 365 TCO (Y years)
TCO_M365 = N * L_m * Y + M_m + T_m + Sum_{t=1..Y}(S_m + P_m(t))

# LibreOffice TCO (Y years)
TCO_Libre = N * L_l * Y + M_l + T_l + Sum_{t=1..Y}(S_l + P_l(t))

# Net present comparison (if discounting)
NPV_delta = NPV(TCO_Libre) - NPV(TCO_M365)

Estimate the quantitative pieces — practical guidance and default assumptions

Below are pragmatic default numbers you can use as a starting point. Replace with your organization’s actuals.

Licensing

• Microsoft 365: L_m — use current enterprise contract rates. For modeling, a representative number (E3-equivalent) is $360–$540 per user per year in 2026 for organizations that pay mid-market/enterprise pricing after discounts. Include add-ons (Copilot, Defender, Advanced Compliance) as separate lines if applicable.
• LibreOffice: L_l — typically $0 for the binary, but commercial support subscriptions range from $5–$25 per user per year depending on SLA and vendor.

Migration & conversion (M)

• Assess counts for: templates, macros (VBA), SharePoint-embedded documents, Power Automate flows, and training assets.
• Typical ranges: small orgs (N < 200) M = $10k–$50k; medium (200–2000) M = $50k–$250k; large >2000 — project-based with multi-phase migration $250k+.

Training (T)

• Estimate 2–8 hours of formal training per user depending on change intensity. Multiply hours by fully loaded hourly cost. Example: 4 hours * $50/h = $200/user.

Support and operations (S)

• Model internal helpdesk cost per ticket and expected ticket volume change. If LibreOffice increases tickets by 10% you must quantify FTE delta.
• Rule of thumb: one helpdesk FTE (fully loaded $100–$140k/year) supports ~500–700 users for standard desktop issues. Adjust for higher complexity.

Productivity (P)

• Start with explicit, measurable events: macro downtime, reformatting required per document, collaboration friction when co-authoring with external partners, and time spent opening/repairing incompatible files.
• Default modeling approach: estimate initial productivity hit in year 1 (for retraining and conversion pain), then a smaller residual delta in subsequent years (recovery or gains if LibreOffice fits workflows better).

Worked scenarios — compute break-even timelines

Below are three representative scenarios that illustrate how assumptions change outcomes. All numbers are illustrative; run the attached model with your actuals.

Scenario A — Small, document-centric non-collaborative org (N = 200)

• L_m = $400/user/yr → annual = $80,000
• L_l = $10/user/yr (vendor support) → annual = $2,000
• M (migration) = $30,000 (templates + macro remediation for a small set)
• T (training) = 4 hours/user * $50/hr = $40,000
• S_m = $15,000/yr, S_l = $25,000/yr (initial support ramp)
• Productivity: Year1 loss = 0.5% of payroll, Year2+ = neutral (because users are document-centric and LibreOffice fits)

3-year totals:

• TCO_M365 (3yr) ≈ $80k * 3 + S_m*3 = $240k + $45k = $285k
• TCO_Libre (3yr) ≈ $2k*3 + M + T + S_l*3 + productivity_loss = $6k + $30k + $40k + $75k + $X ≈ $151k + X

Outcome: LibreOffice breaks even within year 1 or 2 depending on exact productivity assumptions — a clear savings candidate for this profile.

Scenario B — Mid-size collaborative org with SharePoint and Power Automate (N = 1,000)

• L_m = $420/user/yr → annual = $420k
• L_l = $8/user/yr → annual = $8k
• M = $200k (macro remediation, SharePoint integration rework)
• T = $200k (combined live training and enablement)
• S_m = $120k/yr, S_l = $160k/yr (higher LibreOffice support + bespoke integrations)
• Productivity: Year1 loss = 1.5% of payroll because many users rely on co-authoring and embedded Power Platform flows; Year2 residual = 0.5%.

3-year totals (simplified):

• TCO_M365 ≈ $420k*3 + S_m*3 = $1.26M + $360k = $1.62M
• TCO_Libre ≈ $8k*3 + M + T + S_l*3 + productivity_losses = $24k + $200k + $200k + $480k + $X ≈ $904k + X

Outcome: LibreOffice shows potential but productivity losses and migration complexity push break-even toward year 3 or beyond. If your organization cannot decouple from SharePoint/Power Platform, sticking with Microsoft is usually cheaper.

Scenario C — Large enterprise with deep Power Platform, Teams telephony (N = 10,000)

For large enterprises, migration costs are project-class and integration into identity and conditional access is deep. Even if license spend is high, the operational and business-risk costs from decoupling make LibreOffice a poor financial choice in most cases unless a targeted subset (e.g., back-office document workers) is selected.

Common hidden costs to include (don’t overlook these)

• Macro remediation: VBA macros often require rewriting or emulation; cost per macro can range from $50 to $5,000 depending on complexity.
• Interoperability with external partners: Clients and partners using Office may send incompatible files; consider conversion workflows and end-user headache costs.
• Legal, compliance, and eDiscovery: If your compliance tooling is tied to Microsoft 365 APIs, you must budget for replacement tooling or custom integrations.
• Document management and co-authoring: If you replace SharePoint Online, include costs for alternative content repositories, search, backup, and retention.
• Support SLA differences: Commercial LibreOffice support vendors vary in SLA — the cheapest option may not be adequate for enterprise SLAs.

Practical migration playbook — minimize risk and shorten break-even

1. Scope users by persona: Identify who truly needs full Microsoft 365 capabilities (Power users, collaboration-heavy, developers) and who is document-centric. Target only the latter for LibreOffice to maximize ROI.
2. Inventory macros & integrations: Use automated discovery (scripts that scan Office files for macros, external links, embedded objects). Prioritize remediation for high-value macros.
3. Pilot with measurable KPIs: Run a 90-day pilot with 50–200 users, track ticket deltas, document conversion failures, and time-to-complete common tasks.
4. Negotiate vendor support: Get enterprise support contracts for LibreOffice with hands-on SLA, escalation paths, and migration services bundled to cap risk.
5. Train intentionally: Focus on the top 10 productivity tasks for each persona. Provide cheat-sheets and file conversion templates to reduce frustration.
6. Hybrid approach: Consider co-existence — keep Microsoft 365 for collaborative teams and move only eligible cohorts to LibreOffice. This reduces migration scope and preserves collaboration capabilities.

Sample spreadsheet model and Python snippet

Use this minimal Python snippet to compute a 3-year TCO and break-even. Replace variables with your data.

def tco(N, L, M, T, S, prod_losses, years=3):
    # prod_losses should be a list of length 'years'
    license_total = N * L * years
    support_total = S * years
    prod_total = sum(prod_losses)
    return license_total + M + T + support_total + prod_total

# Example inputs (replace with your actuals)
N = 500
L_m = 420  # MS365 per-user/year
L_l = 10   # LibreOffice vendor support per-user/year
M_l = 100000
T_l = 50000
S_m = 80000
S_l = 120000
prod_m = [0, 0, 0]  # assume baseline
prod_l = [50000, 20000, 10000]

m365_cost = tco(N, L_m, 0, 0, S_m, prod_m)
libre_cost = tco(N, L_l, M_l, T_l, S_l, prod_l)

print('M365 3yr TCO', m365_cost)
print('Libre 3yr TCO', libre_cost)
print('Delta (Libre - M365)', libre_cost - m365_cost)

Decision checklist for finance & IT

• Have you segmented users into personas and measured feature dependency per persona?
• Do you have an accurate macro/integration inventory and cost estimate for remediation?
• Have you quantified helpdesk ticket risk and added the expected FTE cost?
• Did you model business continuity, eDiscovery, and compliance tool replacement costs?
• Have you run a pilot and measured real productivity deltas rather than assuming them?

Pro tip: In 2026, the most successful migrations are hybrid and surgical — move low-dependency users to LibreOffice and keep Microsoft for collaboration and automation-heavy teams.

When LibreOffice is the right strategic choice

• Large population of offline or document-only users (e.g., legal discovery reviewers, back-office clerks).
• Strong compliance need for local-only documents and desire to reduce cloud exposure.
• Clear plan and budget for macro remediation, and access to a commercial LibreOffice support vendor.
• Ability to accept limited co-authoring and advanced collaboration trade-offs.
• Procurement pressure where Microsoft add-ons significantly raise per-user costs and savings are required quickly.

When you should not replace Microsoft 365

• Heavily invested in Power Platform, SharePoint Online, Teams telephony, or Microsoft Graph integrations.
• Significant external collaboration with partners who use Office formats and advanced features every day.
• Compliance and eDiscovery tooling depend on Microsoft tenancy metadata that would be difficult or costly to re-create.

Real-world example (anonymized case study)

One public-sector organization (N ≈ 2,500) evaluated LibreOffice for back-office staff after a 2024 licensing repricing. They scoped the migration to 600 document-centric users, completed a 90-day pilot, and negotiated a 3-year commercial support contract for LibreOffice. Migration+migration tooling: $120k. Training: $90k. First-year support ramp: +0.5 FTE ($70k). They modeled conservative productivity loss and achieved break-even in 18 months for the 600-user cohort — while the rest of the organization stayed on Microsoft 365.

Final takeaways and actionable next steps

• Run a persona-level TCO: Don’t treat all users the same. Export license and usage telemetry and segment users into personas that map to functionality dependency.
• Pilot first: Do a time-boxed pilot with strict KPIs (ticket volume change, task completion time, file compatibility rate).
• Include business impact: Model productivity effects in monetary terms and be conservative about assumed gains.
• Negotiate support: Contractually cap migration risk with a vendor that offers migration and SLA-backed support for LibreOffice.
• Consider hybrid: Surgical migration of eligible cohorts gives the most predictable ROI and minimal business risk.

Call to action

If you’re evaluating this change, download our ready-to-use TCO spreadsheet and Python calculator (updated for 2026 pricing trends), run the persona-level model with your data, and if you want, schedule a cost assessment workshop. newservice.cloud helps procurement and IT build these models, run pilots, and negotiate vendor support to shorten break-even timelines safely.

Related Reading

• Create a Multi-Use Entryway for Urban Cyclists: E-bike Parking, Shoe Storage and Charging Station
• Guide to Choosing a Vehicle for Moving High-Value Property Contents
• Seasonal Scent Swaps: Which Perfume to Reach for When Your Coat Changes
• What the Filoni ‘Star Wars’ Reboot Means for Your Sign: A Cosmic Take on a Controversial Slate
• Top Smart Accessories to Keep in Your Backpack for Winter Travel